Global Negotiation Strategies Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Global Negotiation Strategies - Essay Example The parantara skill that often receives credit for driving business the Indonesian way stands out in the sense that it ensures neutrality between the interested parties throughout the negotiation process. Similarly, many Indonesians embrace the skill because it has other mechanisms of raising conflicting issues, thereby ascertaining that harmony prevails throughout the negotiation process. The event that the parantara skill of negotiation ascertains that there is no conflict throughout the negotiation process implies that it is effective. Its effectivity is similarly measured by the fact that it keeps the perceptions of the negotiating parties neutral throughout the process, hence resulting in a long-term association. To make sense out of negotiation as a whole, I looked into the reports of two of my classmates; one handled Saudi Arabia while the other dwelt on Belgium. I found the Saudi Arabian question interesting in that the parties are at liberty to be late for their discussions. On the other hand, it is uncalled for that negotiation in Saudi Arabia leave out mothers and women because they belong to the female gender (Cavusgil et.al, 2002). Similarly, it is interesting to note that pointing of fingers is unacceptable while carrying out negotiations in Saudi Arabia. The Belgians on the other hand embrace Flemish and Wallon strategies of negotiations. Negotiations in Belgium often take an exploratory manner; thereby looking at all the available options before settling on one. It is of great significance to recognize the fact that the Belgian negotiation culture is flexible, hence making them ready to compromise their stance in order to find a solution to any problems that

Elitism and Institutional Power Paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Elitism and Institutional Power Paper - Essay Example This is made worse due to the fact that a relatively small number of companies and banks hold most of the monetary assets in the country (25 large banks and about the same number of insurance companies, out of a long list of these institutions that exist in America) (Dye, 2002). The basis of the power these companies and banks have is mainly derived out of their control of the money and assets of the country. It is not merely the fact that these individuals and companies are wealthy, but also their independence from the government and the president, that gives them practically free reign. As the ones holding more than half of the countrys assets and wealth, it is up to them to make important financial decisions which have a direct and integral impact on both the citizens of the country and their government. They can allow or disallow loans to the government, change the conditions in which loans are granted and make other critical decisions which will apply to everyone, from the smallest citizen to the largest organization (including the government). This means that the government is actually dependent on these institutions, and as a result- they have a tremendous amount of power on it. It is most logic and painfully obvious that those who consist of this li st of the money elite will not want to relinquish their power. Consequently, it is safe to assume that they use strategies in order to maintain their status and influence. Due to their already main and integral role in the fiscal affairs of the country, it is safe to assume that the companies and banks will retain their power and status as long as they remain financially stable and secure. However, in order to ensure this and possibly even increase their reputation and status, one strategy that is implemented is the merger of main companies or banks. By merging with smaller companies or maybe even with